12E1
Relationships with habitat classifications. EUNIS: E1.72 Bent fescue grassland, E1.73 Wavy hair-grass grassland, E1.833 Balkan montane mat-grass swards; PAL. CLASS.: 35.12 [Agrostis] – [Festuca] grasslands, 35.13 [Deschampsia flexuosa] grasslands, 35.73 Balkan montane mat-grass swards; HD 92/43: 6520 Mountain hay meadows ; Bondev (1991): 26 Grass communities (Agrostideta capillaris, Nardeta strictae etc.) replacing spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), silver pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and balkan pine (Pinus peuce Griseb.) forests, 44 Grass communities (Agrostideta capillaris, Nardeta strictae, Bellardiochloeta violaceae etc.) replacing ordinary beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and white fir (Abies alba Mill.).
Conservation status. BDA, BC, HD.
Category. Endangered [EN - A1, 2 B1 C1 D1 E2 F2 G2 H2 I J L2].
General characteristics. The mountain pastures are secondary plant communities that have replaced mesophytic forests or mesophytic meadows due to changes in the regimes of use. They occur in the mountains where extensive stock breeding is widely practiced. This habitat has originated in the same soil and climatic conditions as the wood and grassland communities in the mountains. However, as a result of the intensive grazing some changes are observed in the structure, humidity and aeration of the soil, and in the floristic composition of the plant communities. Syntaxonomically, the mountain pastures belong to class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, order Arrhenatheretalia and alliance Cynosurion. Plant communities with floristic composition close to the one of the xerophytic communities from the class Festuco-Brometea develop in the lower parts of the mountains (700–1000 m alt.) and in dry places. Two varieties of the association Pastinaco hirsutae-Festucetum nigrescentis (i.e. Galium verum var. and Dianthus armeria var.) have been described for Rhodopi Mts. At higher altitudes of distribution (1600–1800 m alt.) where the temperature is low and humidity is high, the mountain pastures are floristically, ecologically and sytaxonomically close to the subalpine and alpine grasslands from the alliances Molinion coeruleae and Potentillo ternatae-Nardion. Parts of these communities belong to the subassociation Verbascetosum longifolii of the association Pastinaco hirsutae-Festucetum nigrescentis. The mountain pastures are closely connected to mountain hay meadows. Very often it is difficult to distinguish one from the other, especially when they are used both as pastures and hay meadows. The dynamic socio-economical processes in the country in the last decades have caused changes in the utilization of these coenoses. Parts of the pastures have been abandoned and hence shrubs and trees have developed. The intensive grazing in close proximity to the human settlements has caused degradation and ruderalization. Human activities and natural processes in the mountain pastures in Bulgaria have resulted in two habitat subtypes.
Characteristic taxa.
Distribution in Bulgaria. The mountain pastures occur in all mountains of the country from 800 up to 1800 (1900) m alt.
Conservation importance. Mountain pastures are a valuable source of forage. They play an important role in soil protection and water-regulation. Some plants of conservation significance also occur like: Carduus thracicus, Centaurea nigrescens, Verbascum jankaeanum, V. longifolium subsp. pannosum.The fungi species of conservation concern Entoloma incanum, Hygrocybe ceracea, H. punicea, H. reai also occur.
Threats. Overgrazing that causes degradation and ruderalization; ploughing and consequent colonisation of shrubs and trees; unregulated tourism; fires.
Conservation measures taken. The habitat is included in Annex № 1 of the national Biodiversity Act. Part of the mountain pastures are within protected areas: Rila, Pirin and Central Balkan National Parks; Vitosha and Balgarka Nature Parks and in sites of the European Ecological Network NATURA 2000 in Bulgaria.
Conservation measures needed. Maintenance of the habitat and regulation of grazing; detailed phytocoenological studies; mapping and monitoring of the preserved and vulnerable habitats; increase of the areas of this habitat included in protected areas.
References. Ganchev et al. 1964; Kitanov 1947; Kozhuharov 1961; Meshinev et al. 2003.
Author: Marius Dimitrov